The publication of Mar Flores' memoirs, entitled 'Mar en calma', has triggered an immediate reaction from her ex-husband, Count Carlo Costanzia di CostiglioleAfter several days of interviews and headlines, the aristocrat has taken action and decided to take legal action to respond to the episodes and statements the model has shared both in her book and on television.
The step that Costanzia is preparing has been advanced by the journalist Silvia Taulés On the TVE program 'D Corazón': Carlo's father reportedly gathered his lawyers to file a lawsuit that would cover what has already been published and what may be said from now on. According to this information, the legal team is closely examining the matter. the content of the book and recent interventions of the model in different formats.
Count Charles's legal decision
Sources close to the aristocrat acknowledge that he is going through a difficult personal time, with Pietro and Rocco in prison, but has still chosen to launch a firm response in defense of his reputation. The strategy involves analyzing every passage of the work and every television statement to determine if there are any possible violations of honor or intrusions into their private lives.
Costanzia's intention, always according to what Taulés reported, would include actions not only for what was stated in the book but also against any future demonstration that you consider damaging. This type of warning is rare, but it aims to protect your position against further interviews or promotions that continue to expand the story.
On the legal level, this type of dispute is usually resolved by weighing the right to freedom of expression and creation of an autobiography versus the right to honor and one's own image. The tone, veracity, and public relevance of the events described will be key, as will the existence of possible documentary or testimonial evidence.
What Mar Flores says in 'Mar en calma' and on television
In her memoirs and recent interviews, the model describes a relationship that, according to her version, went from an initial passion to a stage marked by fearShe describes episodes of physical and psychological abuse and claims that her ex-husband tried to destroy her, using an attitude she describes as cruel and vengeful. These allegations have been presented in detail on camera.
One of the most delicate passages attributed to Costanzia is the abduction of her son when I was very little, taking him to Italy for several weeks without the mother's knowledge. According to that account, the child was recovered thanks to the help of Fernando Fernández Tapias and Alessandro Lequio, an episode that she claims was especially traumatic.
Flores has also hinted that her son might not know the details of some of these events and that she doesn't want to reopen a family feud. Even so, she says she's decided to tell her story now, convinced that "it's your truth" and that it can serve as a reference to other women who have gone through similar situations.
A brief and stormy marriage in the 90s
The relationship between the two was forged at great speed in the 90s: They got married a few months later, when their romance was making headlines. Over time, according to the model, jealousy, arguments, and an unsustainable relationship ensued. The separation occurred at the end of the decade, and since then, disagreements have recurred periodically.
The media echo never completely disappeared, partly due to the notoriety of both and the common child That public attention has now been revived with the release of the book and the possibility of legal proceedings that would put her story back in the spotlight.
What can happen now?
If the claim is formalized, it is expected that a civil way For the protection of honor and privacy, with a claim for rectification and/or compensation if the judge upholds the claim. It is not out of the question that measures may be requested to prevent further references while the dispute is resolved, although their granting is usually exceptional.
For their part, Mar Flores and the publisher could argue that the story has public interest, which has been developed based on lived experience and that there is a legitimate exercise of freedom of expression. The dispute could be supported by documents, witnesses, and expert opinions that confirm or refute the disputed facts.
Beyond the judicial aspect, the case has family and media implications: it affects an environment already strained by the situation of Costanzia's other children and could affect the model's future appearances. The coming weeks will be crucial to determine whether there is any common ground or if the dispute escalates to court.
The scenario that unfolds leaves aside the calm suggested by the title of the book: Carlo Costanzia has decided to defend his version of events through legal means, while Mar Flores maintains her first-person account. Between the right to tell one's life story and the right to honor, it will be the courts that will determine how far each side can go.
